Blood disorders icon

Blood disorders

Core data points

At a glance

16 patient groups shared a commentary
52% Regularly or sometimes engage with drug regulators
27 Comments / feedback
7 Sub-types of blood disorders represented
8 Countries represented
~51.5K Approximate number of patients reached by these groups

Survey insights

Of the 29 blood disorder patient groups, 52% represent patient interests to drug regulators. Engagement is evenly spread: participating in HTA and reimbursement reviews, attending meetings with policymakers/regulators, participating in public hearings and consultations and working within multi-stakeholder networks are each cited by 19%. On advocacy, influencing healthcare policy and legislation, mobilising parliamentarians and political leaders and facilitating equitable access to healthcare are level (19% each).

Patient groups representing each Blood disorders sub-type

29 patient groups across 7 sub-types

  • Sickle cell disease 16
  • Blood disorders: most types 4
  • Anaemia 3
  • Blood disorders: ITP 2
  • Blood disorders: other 1
  • Thalassaemia 1
  • Thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP) 1

Patient group voices

Patient group goals

The percentages below highlight how the 16 patient groups interact with regulators and advocate for patient interests. As respondents may be represented in more than one area, percentages may not total 100%.

interactions

How patient groups interact with drug regulators

Find out what the goals mean
8 mentions
4 mentions
3 mentions
actions & advocacy

How patient groups get access to medicines

Find out what the goals mean
6 mentions
4 mentions
2 mentions

GET THE REPORT

Access the full findings

Our research covers 2,262 patient groups representing 100 countries and 45 therapy areas. The sample report shows you the depth of analysis for a single country or therapy area. To access any other reports, please get in touch.

Visit patient-view.com to gather more information or email: Alex Wyke, alexwyke@patient-view.com