Bleeding disorders icon

Bleeding disorders

Core data points

At a glance

35 patient groups shared a commentary
67% Regularly or sometimes engage with drug regulators
58 Comments / feedback
3 Sub-types of bleeding disorders represented
20 Countries represented
~166K Approximate number of patients reached by these groups

Survey insights

Of the 63 patient groups from bleeding disorders, 67% represent patient interests to drug regulators. The most common form is attending meetings with policymakers/regulators (23%). When advocating patient groups concentrate on access and pricing/reimbursement.

Patient groups representing each Bleeding disorders sub-type

63 patient groups across 3 sub-types

  • Bleeding disorders: most types 33
  • Haemophilia 29
  • Bleeding disorders: other 1

Patient group voices

Patient group goals

The percentages below highlight how the 35 patient groups interact with regulators and advocate for patient interests. As respondents may be represented in more than one area, percentages may not total 100%.

interactions

How patient groups interact with drug regulators

Find out what the goals mean
19 mentions
8 mentions
6 mentions
2 mentions
1 mention
1 mention
actions & advocacy

How patient groups get access to medicines

Find out what the goals mean
10 mentions
5 mentions
3 mentions
2 mentions

GET THE REPORT

Access the full findings

Our research covers 2,262 patient groups representing 100 countries and 45 therapy areas. The sample report shows you the depth of analysis for a single country or therapy area. To access any other reports, please get in touch.

Visit patient-view.com to gather more information or email: Alex Wyke, alexwyke@patient-view.com